Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Randy EdsallFrank Kimbrough

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Frank Kimbrough

Frank Kimbrough: 43rd pct vs Randy Edsall: 35th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Clear edge

Edge: Frank Kimbrough

Frank Kimbrough: 70th pct vs Randy Edsall: 58th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Frank Kimbrough vs Randy Edsall

Frank Kimbrough: 7th pct vs Randy Edsall: 7th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Frank Kimbrough vs Randy Edsall

Frank Kimbrough: 0 titles vs Randy Edsall: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Clear edge

Edge: Randy Edsall

Randy Edsall: 22 seasons vs Frank Kimbrough: 19 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: Frank Kimbrough

Frank Kimbrough: 52.0% vs Randy Edsall: 43.2%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Randy Edsall sets the reference point in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Randy Edsall sets the reference point in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Randy Edsall

Lower end

Raw avg SP Overall: -7.2

35th pct

Lower end

Frank Kimbrough

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Randy EdsallFrank Kimbrough
EliteStrongAverageLean
Randy Edsall: 2011 MarylandRandy Edsall: 2017 UConnFrank Kimbrough: 1941 BaylorFrank Kimbrough: 1943 North Carolina Pre-FlightFrank Kimbrough: 1945 BaylorFrank Kimbrough: 1947 West Texas A&M
1939Actual season year • SRS range -27.9 to 13.62021

Active comparison point

Randy Edsall2009

Selected

2009 UConn

Best season

8-5 • SRS 8.7 • SP Overall 5.4

Win %

61.5%

YoY SRS

+4.0

SP Off / Def

30.3 / 24.8

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Frank Kimbrough

Nearest year 1957West Texas A&M

Profile

7-3 • SRS 0.6 • SP Overall

Randy Edsall holds a 8.1-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Randy Edsall
UConn2000-20211676-95-7.58.7Longest stop
Maryland2011-2015522-34-4.20.9
Frank Kimbrough
Hardin-Simmons1939-1940216-1-11.14.7
Baylor1941-1946415-23-31.05.8
North Carolina Pre-Flight1943-194312-4-1-13.1-13.1
West Texas A&M1947-19571154-52-2-9.113.6Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Longer run

Randy Edsall

98-12943.2%21 seasons • 0 titles

22 tracked seasons across the arc.

Full profile →

Best Season

UConn 2009

SRS 8.7

Worst Season

UConn 2018

SRS -27.9

Biggest Improvement

UConn 2002

20.9 SRS

Higher ceiling

Frank Kimbrough

87-80-752.0%18 seasons • 0 titles

13.6 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

West Texas A&M 1950

SRS 13.6

Worst Season

West Texas A&M 1951

SRS -26.2

Biggest Improvement

West Texas A&M 1950

22.5 SRS