Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Kimbrough
Frank Kimbrough: 43rd pct vs Randy Edsall: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Kimbrough
Frank Kimbrough: 43rd pct vs Randy Edsall: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Frank Kimbrough
Frank Kimbrough: 70th pct vs Randy Edsall: 58th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Frank Kimbrough vs Randy Edsall
Frank Kimbrough: 7th pct vs Randy Edsall: 7th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Kimbrough vs Randy Edsall
Frank Kimbrough: 0 titles vs Randy Edsall: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Randy Edsall
Randy Edsall: 22 seasons vs Frank Kimbrough: 19 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Frank Kimbrough
Frank Kimbrough: 52.0% vs Randy Edsall: 43.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Randy Edsall sets the reference point in overall strength.
Randy Edsall sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Randy Edsall
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -7.2
35th pct
Lower end
Frank Kimbrough
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-5 • SRS 8.7 • SP Overall 5.4
Win %
61.5%
YoY SRS
+4.0
SP Off / Def
30.3 / 24.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Frank Kimbrough
Nearest year 1957 • West Texas A&M
7-3 • SRS 0.6 • SP Overall —
Randy Edsall holds a 8.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randy Edsall | |||||
| UConn | 2000-2021 | 16 | 76-95 | -7.5 | 8.7Longest stop |
| Maryland | 2011-2015 | 5 | 22-34 | -4.2 | 0.9 |
| Frank Kimbrough | |||||
| Hardin-Simmons | 1939-1940 | 2 | 16-1-1 | 1.1 | 4.7 |
| Baylor | 1941-1946 | 4 | 15-23-3 | 1.0 | 5.8 |
| North Carolina Pre-Flight | 1943-1943 | 1 | 2-4-1 | -13.1 | -13.1 |
| West Texas A&M | 1947-1957 | 11 | 54-52-2 | -9.1 | 13.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
98-129 • 43.2% • 21 seasons • 0 titles
22 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
UConn 2009
SRS 8.7
Worst Season
UConn 2018
SRS -27.9
Biggest Improvement
UConn 2002
20.9 SRS
87-80-7 • 52.0% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
13.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
West Texas A&M 1950
SRS 13.6
Worst Season
West Texas A&M 1951
SRS -26.2
Biggest Improvement
West Texas A&M 1950
22.5 SRS