Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: David Gibbs
David Gibbs: 51st pct vs Kurt Roper: 26th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Kurt RoperDavid Gibbs
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: David Gibbs vs Kurt Roper
David Gibbs: 30th pct vs Kurt Roper: 30th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Gibbs vs Kurt Roper
David Gibbs: 0 titles vs Kurt Roper: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: David Gibbs vs Kurt Roper
David Gibbs: 1 seasons vs Kurt Roper: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: David Gibbs
David Gibbs: 100.0% vs Kurt Roper: 0.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
David Gibbs has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDavid Gibbs has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Kurt Roper
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -0.7
54th pct
Mixed
David Gibbs
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 5.4
74th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Kurt RoperDavid Gibbs
EliteStrongAverageLean
2014Actual season year • SRS range -2.4 to -2.32018
Active comparison point
Kurt Roper • 2018
2018 Colorado
Best seasonWorst season0-1 • SRS -2.4 • SP Overall -0.7
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
27.0 / 27.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
David Gibbs
Nearest year 2014 • Houston
1-0 • SRS -2.3 • SP Overall 5.4
Kurt Roper trails by a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -3.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurt Roper | |||||
| Colorado | 2018-2018 | 1 | 0-1 | -2.4 | -2.4 |
| David Gibbs | |||||
| Houston | 2014-2014 | 1 | 1-0 | -2.3 | -2.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Kurt Roper
0-1 • 0.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Colorado 2018
SRS -2.4
Worst Season
Colorado 2018
SRS -2.4
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Higher career quality
Full profile →David Gibbs
1-0 • 100.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
51st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Houston 2014
SRS -2.3
Worst Season
Houston 2014
SRS -2.3
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—