Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: David Cropp
David Cropp: 57th pct vs Leonard Raffensperger: 40th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
David CroppLeonard Raffensperger
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Leonard Raffensperger vs David Cropp
Leonard Raffensperger: 43rd pct vs David Cropp: 41st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Cropp vs Leonard Raffensperger
David Cropp: 0 titles vs Leonard Raffensperger: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: David Cropp vs Leonard Raffensperger
David Cropp: 2 seasons vs Leonard Raffensperger: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: David Cropp
David Cropp: 76.3% vs Leonard Raffensperger: 36.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
David Cropp
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Leonard Raffensperger
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
David CroppLeonard Raffensperger
EliteStrongAverageLean
1903Actual season year • SRS range 0.9 to 3.51951
Active comparison point
David Cropp • 1904
1904 Colorado
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest drop6-2-1 • SRS 2.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.2%
YoY SRS
+1.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Leonard Raffensperger
Nearest year 1950 • Iowa
3-5-1 • SRS 3.5 • SP Overall —
David Cropp trails by a 0.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Cropp | |||||
| Colorado | 1903-1904 | 2 | 14-4-1 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| Leonard Raffensperger | |||||
| Iowa | 1950-1951 | 2 | 5-10-3 | 2.2 | 3.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →David Cropp
14-4-1 • 76.3% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
57th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Colorado 1904
SRS 2.8
Worst Season
Colorado 1903
SRS 1.4
Biggest Improvement
Colorado 1904
1.4 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Leonard Raffensperger
5-10-3 • 36.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Iowa 1950
SRS 3.5
Worst Season
Iowa 1951
SRS 0.9
Biggest Improvement
Iowa 1951
-2.6 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.