Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Clarence Stasavich
Clarence Stasavich: 25th pct vs Tuffy Mullison: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Clarence Stasavich
Clarence Stasavich: 25th pct vs Tuffy Mullison: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Tuffy Mullison
Tuffy Mullison: 32nd pct vs Clarence Stasavich: 23rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Tuffy Mullison
Tuffy Mullison: 22nd pct vs Clarence Stasavich: 15th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Clarence Stasavich vs Tuffy Mullison
Clarence Stasavich: 0 titles vs Tuffy Mullison: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Tuffy Mullison vs Clarence Stasavich
Tuffy Mullison: 6 seasons vs Clarence Stasavich: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Clarence Stasavich
Clarence Stasavich: 56.1% vs Tuffy Mullison: 32.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tuffy Mullison
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Clarence Stasavich
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-4 • SRS -1.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+18.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Clarence Stasavich
Nearest year 1965 • East Carolina
9-1 • SRS -8.4 • SP Overall —
Tuffy Mullison holds a 7.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuffy Mullison | |||||
| Colorado State | 1956-1961 | 6 | 19-40-1 | -15.8 | -1.4Highest peak |
| Clarence Stasavich | |||||
| East Carolina | 1965-1969 | 5 | 27-21-1 | -15.9 | -5.6 |
Closing takeaway
19-40-1 • 32.5% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
-1.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Colorado State 1958
SRS -1.4
Worst Season
Colorado State 1956
SRS -26.0
Biggest Improvement
Colorado State 1958
18.7 SRS
27-21-1 • 56.1% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
25th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
East Carolina 1967
SRS -5.6
Worst Season
East Carolina 1969
SRS -33.1
Biggest Improvement
East Carolina 1967
9.0 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.