Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: HE Fisher
HE Fisher: 25th pct vs John McIntosh: 11th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
John McIntoshHE Fisher
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: John McIntosh vs HE Fisher
John McIntosh: 20th pct vs HE Fisher: 20th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: HE Fisher vs John McIntosh
HE Fisher: 0 titles vs John McIntosh: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: HE Fisher vs John McIntosh
HE Fisher: 2 seasons vs John McIntosh: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: HE Fisher
HE Fisher: 58.8% vs John McIntosh: 29.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John McIntosh
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
HE Fisher
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
John McIntoshHE Fisher
EliteStrongAverageLean
1902Actual season year • SRS range -30.0 to -7.11905
Active comparison point
John McIntosh • 1905
1905 Colorado State
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest drop3-4 • SRS -7.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
42.9%
YoY SRS
+22.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
HE Fisher
Nearest year 1903 • Tennessee
4-5 • SRS -29.5 • SP Overall —
John McIntosh holds a 22.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McIntosh | |||||
| Colorado State | 1904-1905 | 2 | 3-8-1 | -18.6 | -7.1 |
| HE Fisher | |||||
| Tennessee | 1902-1903 | 2 | 10-7 | -18.4 | -7.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →John McIntosh
3-8-1 • 29.2% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Colorado State 1905
SRS -7.1
Worst Season
Colorado State 1904
SRS -30.0
Biggest Improvement
Colorado State 1905
22.9 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →HE Fisher
10-7 • 58.8% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
25th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Tennessee 1902
SRS -7.3
Worst Season
Tennessee 1903
SRS -29.5
Biggest Improvement
Tennessee 1903
-22.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.