Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Clarence Griffith
Clarence Griffith: 10th pct vs Sam Francis: 5th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Clarence GriffithSam Francis
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Sam Francis vs Clarence Griffith
Sam Francis: 6th pct vs Clarence Griffith: 6th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Clarence Griffith vs Sam Francis
Clarence Griffith: 0 titles vs Sam Francis: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Clarence Griffith vs Sam Francis
Clarence Griffith: 1 seasons vs Sam Francis: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Clarence Griffith
Clarence Griffith: 33.3% vs Sam Francis: 0.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Clarence Griffith
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Sam Francis
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Clarence GriffithSam Francis
EliteStrongAverageLean
1902Actual season year • SRS range -18.3 to -18.01947
Active comparison point
Clarence Griffith • 1902
1902 Colorado State
Best seasonWorst season1-3-2 • SRS -18.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
33.3%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Sam Francis
Nearest year 1947 • Kansas State
0-10 • SRS -18.0 • SP Overall —
Clarence Griffith trails by a 0.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarence Griffith | |||||
| Colorado State | 1902-1902 | 1 | 1-3-2 | -18.3 | -18.3 |
| Sam Francis | |||||
| Kansas State | 1947-1947 | 1 | 0-10 | -18.0 | -18.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Clarence Griffith
1-3-2 • 33.3% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
10th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Colorado State 1902
SRS -18.3
Worst Season
Colorado State 1902
SRS -18.3
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Sam Francis
0-10 • 0.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kansas State 1947
SRS -18.0
Worst Season
Kansas State 1947
SRS -18.0
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.