Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Jess Hill
Jess Hill: 92nd pct vs Cecil Isbell: 68th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Jess Hill
Jess Hill: 92nd pct vs Cecil Isbell: 68th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Jess Hill
Jess Hill: 95th pct vs Cecil Isbell: 85th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Cecil Isbell
Cecil Isbell: 67th pct vs Jess Hill: 61st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Cecil Isbell vs Jess Hill
Cecil Isbell: 0 titles vs Jess Hill: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Jess Hill
Jess Hill: 6 seasons vs Cecil Isbell: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jess Hill
Jess Hill: 72.2% vs Cecil Isbell: 50.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jess Hill
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Cecil Isbell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-1 • SRS 27.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
90.9%
YoY SRS
+15.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#5
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Cecil Isbell
Nearest year 1946 • Purdue
2-6-1 • SRS 7.8 • SP Overall —
Jess Hill holds a 19.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jess Hill | |||||
| USC | 1951-1956 | 6 | 45-17-1 | 15.3 | 27.0Highest peak |
| Cecil Isbell | |||||
| Purdue | 1944-1946 | 3 | 14-14-1 | 15.6 | 20.5 |
Closing takeaway
45-17-1 • 72.2% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
92nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
USC 1952
SRS 27.0
Worst Season
USC 1953
SRS 8.2
Biggest Improvement
USC 1952
15.5 SRS
14-14-1 • 50.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
67th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Purdue 1945
SRS 20.5
Worst Season
Purdue 1946
SRS 7.8
Biggest Improvement
Purdue 1945
2.0 SRS