Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Gus Henderson vs George Brooke
Gus Henderson: 77th pct vs George Brooke: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gus HendersonGeorge Brooke
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: George Brooke
George Brooke: 91st pct vs Gus Henderson: 87th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: George Brooke
George Brooke: 61st pct vs Gus Henderson: 52nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George Brooke vs Gus Henderson
George Brooke: 0 titles vs Gus Henderson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Gus Henderson vs George Brooke
Gus Henderson: 14 seasons vs George Brooke: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Gus Henderson
Gus Henderson: 72.7% vs George Brooke: 66.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gus Henderson
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
George Brooke
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gus HendersonGeorge Brooke
EliteStrongAverageLean
Gus Henderson: 1933 TulsaGeorge Brooke: 1913 Pennsylvania
1903Actual season year • SRS range 1.4 to 24.11935
Active comparison point
Gus Henderson • 1922
1922 USC
Best season10-1 • SRS 21.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
90.9%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Brooke
Nearest year 1915 • Pennsylvania
3-5-2 • SRS 11.6 • SP Overall —
Gus Henderson holds a 9.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gus Henderson | |||||
| USC | 1922-1924 | 3 | 25-5 | 17.0Best quality | 21.0 |
| Tulsa | 1933-1935 | 3 | 14-9-2 | 7.5 | 10.8 |
| George Brooke | |||||
| Swarthmore | 1903-1912 | 6 | 39-13-1 | 12.9 | 24.1Highest peak |
| Pennsylvania | 1913-1915 | 3 | 13-12-4 | 10.5 | 17.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Gus Henderson
39-14-2 • 72.7% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
USC 1922
SRS 21.0
Worst Season
Tulsa 1935
SRS 1.4
Biggest Improvement
USC 1924
9.5 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →George Brooke
52-25-5 • 66.5% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
61st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Swarthmore 1907
SRS 24.1
Worst Season
Pennsylvania 1914
SRS 2.2
Biggest Improvement
Swarthmore 1907
10.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.