Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Jeff CravathGilmour Dobie

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Jeff Cravath

Jeff Cravath: 78th pct vs Gilmour Dobie: 73rd pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Clear edge

Edge: Gilmour Dobie

Gilmour Dobie: 97th pct vs Jeff Cravath: 85th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Jeff Cravath vs Gilmour Dobie

Jeff Cravath: 2nd pct vs Gilmour Dobie: 2nd pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Gilmour Dobie vs Jeff Cravath

Gilmour Dobie: 0 titles vs Jeff Cravath: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Gilmour Dobie vs Jeff Cravath

Gilmour Dobie: 23 seasons vs Jeff Cravath: 22 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: Gilmour Dobie

Gilmour Dobie: 70.9% vs Jeff Cravath: 62.3%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Jeff Cravath

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Gilmour Dobie

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Jeff CravathGilmour Dobie
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jeff Cravath: 1941 San FranciscoJeff Cravath: 1942 USCGilmour Dobie: 1917 NavyGilmour Dobie: 1920 CornellGilmour Dobie: 1937 Boston College
1916Actual season year • SRS range -22.6 to 29.81950

Active comparison point

Jeff Cravath1947

Selected

1947 USC

Best season

7-2-1 • SRS 20.2 • SP Overall

Win %

75.0%

YoY SRS

+9.1

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

#8

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Gilmour Dobie

Nearest year 1938Boston College

Profile

6-1-2 • SRS 6.6 • SP Overall

Jeff Cravath holds a 13.6-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Jeff Cravath
Denver1929-1931314-11-1-15.5-5.4
San Francisco1941-194116-4-7.0-7.0
USC1942-1950954-28-811.620.2
Gilmour Dobie
Washington1916-191616-0-117.017.0
Navy1917-1919317-324.7Best quality27.4
Cornell1920-19351682-36-73.829.8Highest peak
Boston College1937-1938210-5-32.86.6

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Higher career quality

Jeff Cravath

74-43-962.3%13 seasons • 0 titles

78th pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

USC 1947

SRS 20.2

Worst Season

Denver 1929

SRS -22.6

Biggest Improvement

Denver 1930

17.2 SRS

Higher ceiling

Gilmour Dobie

115-44-1170.9%22 seasons • 0 titles

29.8 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

Cornell 1923

SRS 29.8

Worst Season

Cornell 1928

SRS -20.6

Biggest Improvement

Cornell 1929

21.3 SRS