Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: ET McDonald
ET McDonald: 29th pct vs DeWayne Walker: 18th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: ET McDonald
ET McDonald: 29th pct vs DeWayne Walker: 18th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: DeWayne Walker
DeWayne Walker: 57th pct vs ET McDonald: 29th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: DeWayne Walker
DeWayne Walker: 3rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: DeWayne Walker vs ET McDonald
DeWayne Walker: 0 titles vs ET McDonald: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: DeWayne Walker
DeWayne Walker: 6 seasons vs ET McDonald: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: ET McDonald
ET McDonald: 61.8% vs DeWayne Walker: 19.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
DeWayne Walker sets the reference point in overall strength.
DeWayne Walker sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
DeWayne Walker
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -19.7
8th pct
Lower end
ET McDonald
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
0-1 • SRS 8.4 • SP Overall 11.2
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
23.1 / 13.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
ET McDonald
Nearest year 1915 • LSU
6-2 • SRS -2.8 • SP Overall —
DeWayne Walker holds a 11.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeWayne Walker | |||||
| UCLA | 2007-2007 | 1 | 0-1 | 8.4Best quality | 8.4Highest peak |
| New Mexico State | 2009-2012 | 4 | 10-40 | -23.3 | -15.7Longest stop |
| ET McDonald | |||||
| LSU | 1914-1915 | 2 | 10-6-1 | -16.4 | -2.8 |
Closing takeaway
10-41 • 19.6% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
8.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
UCLA 2007
SRS 8.4
Worst Season
New Mexico State 2012
SRS -28.2
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 2011
8.1 SRS
10-6-1 • 61.8% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
29th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
LSU 1915
SRS -2.8
Worst Season
LSU 1914
SRS -29.9
Biggest Improvement
LSU 1915
27.1 SRS