Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: William Spaulding vs Arthur Guepe
William Spaulding: 61st pct vs Arthur Guepe: 60th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
William SpauldingArthur Guepe
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Arthur Guepe vs William Spaulding
Arthur Guepe: 78th pct vs William Spaulding: 77th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Arthur Guepe
Arthur Guepe: 46th pct vs William Spaulding: 35th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Arthur Guepe vs William Spaulding
Arthur Guepe: 0 titles vs William Spaulding: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Arthur Guepe vs William Spaulding
Arthur Guepe: 17 seasons vs William Spaulding: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: William Spaulding
William Spaulding: 56.7% vs Arthur Guepe: 54.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
William Spaulding
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Arthur Guepe
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
William SpauldingArthur Guepe
EliteStrongAverageLean
William Spaulding: 1928 UCLAArthur Guepe: 1953 Vanderbilt
1922Actual season year • SRS range -10.0 to 17.01962
Active comparison point
William Spaulding • 1935
1935 UCLA
Best season8-2 • SRS 16.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+13.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Arthur Guepe
Nearest year 1946 • Virginia
4-4-1 • SRS 1.5 • SP Overall —
William Spaulding holds a 15.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Spaulding | |||||
| Minnesota | 1922-1924 | 3 | 11-7-4 | 9.6Best quality | 13.8 |
| UCLA | 1928-1938 | 11 | 56-43-6 | 3.7 | 16.5 |
| Arthur Guepe | |||||
| Virginia | 1946-1952 | 7 | 47-17-2 | 7.2 | 12.8 |
| Vanderbilt | 1953-1962 | 10 | 39-54-7 | 3.3 | 17.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →William Spaulding
67-50-10 • 56.7% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UCLA 1935
SRS 16.5
Worst Season
UCLA 1930
SRS -10.0
Biggest Improvement
UCLA 1931
21.4 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Arthur Guepe
86-71-9 • 54.5% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
46th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Vanderbilt 1955
SRS 17.0
Worst Season
Vanderbilt 1962
SRS -7.7
Biggest Improvement
Vanderbilt 1955
16.1 SRS