Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Phillip Fulmer vs Red Sanders
Phillip Fulmer: 94th pct vs Red Sanders: 93rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Phillip Fulmer vs Red Sanders
Phillip Fulmer: 94th pct vs Red Sanders: 93rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Red Sanders vs Phillip Fulmer
Red Sanders: 92nd pct vs Phillip Fulmer: 92nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Phillip Fulmer
Phillip Fulmer: 55th pct vs Red Sanders: 51st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Phillip Fulmer
Phillip Fulmer: 1 title vs Red Sanders: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Red Sanders vs Phillip Fulmer
Red Sanders: 18 seasons vs Phillip Fulmer: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Phillip Fulmer
Phillip Fulmer: 74.3% vs Red Sanders: 70.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Phillip Fulmer sets the reference point in overall strength.
Phillip Fulmer sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Red Sanders
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Phillip Fulmer
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 19.9
98th pct
Elite
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-2 • SRS 24.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
81.8%
YoY SRS
+3.8
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#4
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Phillip Fulmer
Nearest year 1992 • Tennessee
4-0 • SRS 13.9 • SP Overall 19.3
Red Sanders holds a 10.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Sanders | |||||
| Vanderbilt | 1940-1948 | 6 | 36-22-2 | 10.6 | 23.5 |
| UCLA | 1949-1957 | 9 | 66-19-1 | 17.0Best quality | 24.7 |
| Phillip Fulmer | |||||
| Tennessee | 1992-2008 | 17 | 151-52-1 | 14.9 | 24.4Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
102-41-3 • 70.9% • 15 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
UCLA 1955
SRS 24.7
Worst Season
Vanderbilt 1940
SRS -0.2
Biggest Improvement
Vanderbilt 1948
12.8 SRS
151-52-1 • 74.3% • 17 seasons • 1 title
2.9 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Tennessee 1993
SRS 24.4
Worst Season
Tennessee 2008
SRS 2.9
Biggest Improvement
Tennessee 2001
11.4 SRS