Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Tommy Prothro
Tommy Prothro: 90th pct vs Steve Sarkisian: 87th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Tommy Prothro
Tommy Prothro: 90th pct vs Steve Sarkisian: 87th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Tommy Prothro
Tommy Prothro: 95th pct vs Steve Sarkisian: 89th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Steve Sarkisian
Steve Sarkisian: 40th pct vs Tommy Prothro: 33rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Steve Sarkisian vs Tommy Prothro
Steve Sarkisian: 0 titles vs Tommy Prothro: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Steve Sarkisian vs Tommy Prothro
Steve Sarkisian: 17 seasons vs Tommy Prothro: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Tommy Prothro
Tommy Prothro: 64.9% vs Steve Sarkisian: 61.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tommy Prothro has the edge in overall strength.
Tommy Prothro has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tommy Prothro
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 19.8
97th pct
Elite
Steve Sarkisian
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 13.3
92th pct
Elite
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-1-1 • SRS 27.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
85.0%
YoY SRS
+22.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#13
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Steve Sarkisian
Nearest year 2009 • Washington
5-7 • SRS 2.9 • SP Overall -0.2
Tommy Prothro holds a 25.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Prothro | |||||
| Oregon State | 1955-1964 | 10 | 63-37-2 | 7.3 | 14.1Longest stop |
| UCLA | 1965-1970 | 6 | 41-18-3 | 18.6Best quality | 27.9Highest peak |
| Steve Sarkisian | |||||
| Washington | 2009-2013 | 5 | 34-29 | 7.0 | 19.8 |
| USC | 2014-2014 | 1 | 9-4 | 16.6 | 16.6 |
| Texas | 2021-2025 | 5 | 38-17 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Closing takeaway
104-55-5 • 64.9% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
27.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
UCLA 1969
SRS 27.9
Worst Season
Oregon State 1958
SRS 0.6
Biggest Improvement
UCLA 1969
22.9 SRS
81-50 • 61.8% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
40th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Texas 2023
SRS 22.0
Worst Season
Washington 2009
SRS 2.9
Biggest Improvement
Washington 2013
15.8 SRS