Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Tommy ProthroSteve Sarkisian

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Tommy Prothro

Tommy Prothro: 90th pct vs Steve Sarkisian: 87th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Narrow edge

Edge: Tommy Prothro

Tommy Prothro: 95th pct vs Steve Sarkisian: 89th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Narrow edge

Edge: Steve Sarkisian

Steve Sarkisian: 40th pct vs Tommy Prothro: 33rd pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Steve Sarkisian vs Tommy Prothro

Steve Sarkisian: 0 titles vs Tommy Prothro: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Steve Sarkisian vs Tommy Prothro

Steve Sarkisian: 17 seasons vs Tommy Prothro: 16 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Narrow edge

Edge: Tommy Prothro

Tommy Prothro: 64.9% vs Steve Sarkisian: 61.8%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Tommy Prothro has the edge in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Narrow edge

Tommy Prothro has the edge in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Tommy Prothro

Elite

Raw avg SP Overall: 19.8

97th pct

Elite

Steve Sarkisian

Elite

Raw avg SP Overall: 13.3

92th pct

Elite

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Tommy ProthroSteve Sarkisian
EliteStrongAverageLean
Tommy Prothro: 1965 UCLASteve Sarkisian: 2014 USCSteve Sarkisian: 2021 Texas
1955Actual season year • SRS range 0.6 to 27.92025

Active comparison point

Tommy Prothro1969

Selected

1969 UCLA

Best seasonBiggest improvement

8-1-1 • SRS 27.9 • SP Overall

Win %

85.0%

YoY SRS

+22.9

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

#13

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Steve Sarkisian

Nearest year 2009Washington

Profile

5-7 • SRS 2.9 • SP Overall -0.2

Tommy Prothro holds a 25.0-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Tommy Prothro
Oregon State1955-19641063-37-27.314.1Longest stop
UCLA1965-1970641-18-318.6Best quality27.9Highest peak
Steve Sarkisian
Washington2009-2013534-297.019.8
USC2014-201419-416.616.6
Texas2021-2025538-1715.022.0

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Higher ceiling

Tommy Prothro

104-55-564.9%16 seasons • 0 titles

27.9 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

UCLA 1969

SRS 27.9

Worst Season

Oregon State 1958

SRS 0.6

Biggest Improvement

UCLA 1969

22.9 SRS

Steadier arc

Steve Sarkisian

81-5061.8%11 seasons • 0 titles

40th pct steadiness score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Texas 2023

SRS 22.0

Worst Season

Washington 2009

SRS 2.9

Biggest Improvement

Washington 2013

15.8 SRS