Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Jordan Olivar
Jordan Olivar: 49th pct vs Frank Kimbrough: 43rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jordan OlivarFrank Kimbrough
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Jordan Olivar vs Frank Kimbrough
Jordan Olivar: 72nd pct vs Frank Kimbrough: 70th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Kimbrough
Frank Kimbrough: 7th pct vs Jordan Olivar: 3rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Kimbrough vs Jordan Olivar
Frank Kimbrough: 0 titles vs Jordan Olivar: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jordan Olivar vs Frank Kimbrough
Jordan Olivar: 20 seasons vs Frank Kimbrough: 19 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jordan Olivar
Jordan Olivar: 63.2% vs Frank Kimbrough: 52.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jordan Olivar
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Frank Kimbrough
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jordan OlivarFrank Kimbrough
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jordan Olivar: 1949 Loyola MarymountJordan Olivar: 1952 YaleFrank Kimbrough: 1941 BaylorFrank Kimbrough: 1943 North Carolina Pre-FlightFrank Kimbrough: 1945 BaylorFrank Kimbrough: 1947 West Texas A&M
1939Actual season year • SRS range -35.3 to 14.21962
Active comparison point
Jordan Olivar • 1948
1948 Villanova
Best season8-2-1 • SRS 14.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
77.3%
YoY SRS
+10.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Frank Kimbrough
Nearest year 1948 • West Texas A&M
6-5 • SRS -14.5 • SP Overall —
Jordan Olivar holds a 28.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Olivar | |||||
| Villanova | 1943-1948 | 6 | 33-20-2 | 1.5 | 14.2 |
| Loyola Marymount | 1949-1951 | 3 | 17-11 | 2.2 | 13.2 |
| Yale | 1952-1962 | 11 | 61-32-6 | -12.2 | 1.3 |
| Frank Kimbrough | |||||
| Hardin-Simmons | 1939-1940 | 2 | 16-1-1 | 1.1 | 4.7 |
| Baylor | 1941-1946 | 4 | 15-23-3 | 1.0 | 5.8 |
| North Carolina Pre-Flight | 1943-1943 | 1 | 2-4-1 | -13.1 | -13.1 |
| West Texas A&M | 1947-1957 | 11 | 54-52-2 | -9.1 | 13.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Jordan Olivar
111-63-8 • 63.2% • 20 seasons • 0 titles
49th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Villanova 1948
SRS 14.2
Worst Season
Yale 1958
SRS -35.3
Biggest Improvement
Yale 1959
20.8 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Frank Kimbrough
87-80-7 • 52.0% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
-26.2 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
West Texas A&M 1950
SRS 13.6
Worst Season
West Texas A&M 1951
SRS -26.2
Biggest Improvement
West Texas A&M 1950
22.5 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.