Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Gus Tebell vs Gene Murphy
Gus Tebell: 23rd pct vs Gene Murphy: 22nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gene MurphyGus Tebell
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Gus Tebell vs Gene Murphy
Gus Tebell: 39th pct vs Gene Murphy: 37th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Gus Tebell
Gus Tebell: 35th pct vs Gene Murphy: 19th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Gene Murphy vs Gus Tebell
Gene Murphy: 0 titles vs Gus Tebell: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Gene Murphy vs Gus Tebell
Gene Murphy: 13 seasons vs Gus Tebell: 12 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Gene Murphy vs Gus Tebell
Gene Murphy: 39.9% vs Gus Tebell: 39.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Gene Murphy sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeGene Murphy sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gene Murphy
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.5
21th pct
Lower end
Gus Tebell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gene MurphyGus Tebell
EliteStrongAverageLean
Gus Tebell: 1934 Virginia
1925Actual season year • SRS range -30.8 to 1.71992
Active comparison point
Gene Murphy • 1984
1984 Cal State Fullerton
Best season11-1 • SRS 1.1 • SP Overall 9.4
Win %
91.7%
YoY SRS
+6.3
SP Off / Def
32.0 / 23.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Gus Tebell
Nearest year 1936 • Virginia
2-7 • SRS -21.1 • SP Overall —
Gene Murphy holds a 22.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene Murphy | |||||
| Cal State Fullerton | 1980-1992 | 13 | 59-89-1 | -13.8 | 1.1Longest stop |
| Gus Tebell | |||||
| NC State | 1925-1929 | 5 | 21-25-2 | -11.0Best quality | 1.7 |
| Virginia | 1934-1936 | 3 | 6-18-4 | -17.3 | -14.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Gene Murphy
59-89-1 • 39.9% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Cal State Fullerton 1984
SRS 1.1
Worst Season
Cal State Fullerton 1990
SRS -30.8
Biggest Improvement
Cal State Fullerton 1983
13.5 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Gus Tebell
27-43-6 • 39.5% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
35th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
NC State 1927
SRS 1.7
Worst Season
NC State 1929
SRS -24.2
Biggest Improvement
NC State 1927
16.7 SRS