Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Kerbel
Joe Kerbel: 47th pct vs Chuck Mills: 41st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Joe KerbelChuck Mills
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Chuck Mills
Chuck Mills: 64th pct vs Joe Kerbel: 48th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Joe Kerbel
Joe Kerbel: 41st pct vs Chuck Mills: 24th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Mills vs Joe Kerbel
Chuck Mills: 0 titles vs Joe Kerbel: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Mills vs Joe Kerbel
Chuck Mills: 11 seasons vs Joe Kerbel: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Joe Kerbel
Joe Kerbel: 61.7% vs Chuck Mills: 42.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Joe Kerbel has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeJoe Kerbel has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Joe Kerbel
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -2.8
47th pct
Mixed
Chuck Mills
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -7.4
34th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Joe KerbelChuck Mills
EliteStrongAverageLean
Chuck Mills: 1973 Wake Forest
1960Actual season year • SRS range -18.1 to 10.91977
Active comparison point
Joe Kerbel • 1967
1967 West Texas A&M
Best season8-3 • SRS 5.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
0.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chuck Mills
Nearest year 1967 • Utah State
7-2-1 • SRS 10.9 • SP Overall —
Joe Kerbel trails by a 5.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Kerbel | |||||
| West Texas A&M | 1960-1970 | 11 | 68-42-1 | -3.3 | 5.2Longest stop |
| Chuck Mills | |||||
| Utah State | 1967-1972 | 6 | 38-23-1 | 2.1Best quality | 10.9Highest peak |
| Wake Forest | 1973-1977 | 5 | 11-43-1 | -8.0 | 3.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Joe Kerbel
68-42-1 • 61.7% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
41st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
West Texas A&M 1967
SRS 5.2
Worst Season
West Texas A&M 1964
SRS -18.1
Biggest Improvement
West Texas A&M 1961
15.9 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Chuck Mills
49-66-2 • 42.7% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
10.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Utah State 1967
SRS 10.9
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1973
SRS -16.9
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 1971
11.0 SRS