Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Tom Keady vs Paul Schissler
Tom Keady: 73rd pct vs Paul Schissler: 70th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Tom KeadyPaul Schissler
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Paul Schissler
Paul Schissler: 85th pct vs Tom Keady: 78th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Tom Keady
Tom Keady: 69th pct vs Paul Schissler: 66th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Paul Schissler vs Tom Keady
Paul Schissler: 0 titles vs Tom Keady: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Paul Schissler vs Tom Keady
Paul Schissler: 9 seasons vs Tom Keady: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Tom Keady
Tom Keady: 70.6% vs Paul Schissler: 61.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tom Keady
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Paul Schissler
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tom KeadyPaul Schissler
EliteStrongAverageLean
1912Actual season year • SRS range -0.6 to 20.31932
Active comparison point
Tom Keady • 1917
1917 Lehigh
Best season7-2 • SRS 16.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
77.8%
YoY SRS
+3.8
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Schissler
Nearest year 1924 • Oregon State
3-5 • SRS -0.6 • SP Overall —
Tom Keady holds a 17.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Keady | |||||
| Lehigh | 1912-1920 | 9 | 55-22-3 | 9.9 | 16.9 |
| Paul Schissler | |||||
| Oregon State | 1924-1932 | 9 | 48-30-2 | 9.2 | 20.3Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Tom Keady
55-22-3 • 70.6% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
3.3 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Lehigh 1917
SRS 16.9
Worst Season
Lehigh 1913
SRS 3.3
Biggest Improvement
Lehigh 1914
12.9 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Paul Schissler
48-30-2 • 61.3% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
20.3 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Oregon State 1928
SRS 20.3
Worst Season
Oregon State 1924
SRS -0.6
Biggest Improvement
Oregon State 1928
13.1 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.