Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Carmen Cozza vs Herb Deromedi
Carmen Cozza: 48th pct vs Herb Deromedi: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Carmen CozzaHerb Deromedi
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Herb Deromedi
Herb Deromedi: 55th pct vs Carmen Cozza: 48th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Herb Deromedi
Herb Deromedi: 52nd pct vs Carmen Cozza: 39th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Carmen Cozza vs Herb Deromedi
Carmen Cozza: 0 titles vs Herb Deromedi: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Carmen Cozza vs Herb Deromedi
Carmen Cozza: 17 seasons vs Herb Deromedi: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Carmen Cozza
Carmen Cozza: 74.5% vs Herb Deromedi: 65.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Carmen Cozza has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeCarmen Cozza has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Carmen Cozza
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 10.0
85th pct
Elite
Herb Deromedi
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.4
69th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Carmen CozzaHerb Deromedi
EliteStrongAverageLean
1965Actual season year • SRS range -23.5 to 7.51993
Active comparison point
Carmen Cozza • 1976
1976 Yale
Best season8-1 • SRS 5.2 • SP Overall 15.4
Win %
88.9%
YoY SRS
+13.0
SP Off / Def
25.5 / 10.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Herb Deromedi
Nearest year 1978 • Central Michigan
9-2 • SRS 6.7 • SP Overall 18.6
Carmen Cozza trails by a 1.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -7.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carmen Cozza | |||||
| Yale | 1965-1981 | 17 | 114-38-3 | -6.0 | 5.2 |
| Herb Deromedi | |||||
| Central Michigan | 1978-1993 | 16 | 110-55-10 | -5.8 | 7.5Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Carmen Cozza
114-38-3 • 74.5% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Yale 1976
SRS 5.2
Worst Season
Yale 1971
SRS -23.5
Biggest Improvement
Yale 1972
28.1 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Herb Deromedi
110-55-10 • 65.7% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
52nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Central Michigan 1979
SRS 7.5
Worst Season
Central Michigan 1986
SRS -18.6
Biggest Improvement
Central Michigan 1983
12.9 SRS