Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Charles Caldwell
Charles Caldwell: 74th pct vs Pat Jones: 67th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Charles Caldwell
Charles Caldwell: 74th pct vs Pat Jones: 67th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Pat Jones
Pat Jones: 79th pct vs Charles Caldwell: 70th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Charles Caldwell vs Pat Jones
Charles Caldwell: 20th pct vs Pat Jones: 19th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charles Caldwell vs Pat Jones
Charles Caldwell: 0 titles vs Pat Jones: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Charles Caldwell vs Pat Jones
Charles Caldwell: 11 seasons vs Pat Jones: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Charles Caldwell
Charles Caldwell: 71.4% vs Pat Jones: 50.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Pat Jones sets the reference point in overall strength.
Pat Jones sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charles Caldwell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Pat Jones
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 2.5
65th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-0 • SRS 13.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+9.8
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#6
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Pat Jones
Nearest year 1984 • Oklahoma State
10-2 • SRS 14.6 • SP Overall 21.2
Charles Caldwell trails by a 1.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Caldwell | |||||
| Princeton | 1946-1956 | 11 | 68-27-1 | 0.8 | 13.5 |
| Pat Jones | |||||
| Oklahoma State | 1984-1994 | 11 | 62-60-3 | 1.9Best quality | 17.4Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
68-27-1 • 71.4% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
74th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Princeton 1950
SRS 13.5
Worst Season
Princeton 1953
SRS -17.4
Biggest Improvement
Princeton 1954
10.7 SRS
62-60-3 • 50.8% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
17.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Oklahoma State 1988
SRS 17.4
Worst Season
Oklahoma State 1991
SRS -9.8
Biggest Improvement
Oklahoma State 1987
16.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.