Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Dutch Witte vs David Elson
Dutch Witte: 11th pct vs David Elson: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Dutch WitteDavid Elson
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Dutch Witte vs David Elson
Dutch Witte: 10th pct vs David Elson: 10th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Dutch Witte vs David Elson
Dutch Witte: 84th pct vs David Elson: 84th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Elson vs Dutch Witte
David Elson: 0 titles vs Dutch Witte: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Dutch Witte
Dutch Witte: 6 seasons vs David Elson: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Dutch Witte
Dutch Witte: 35.7% vs David Elson: 25.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
David Elson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDavid Elson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dutch Witte
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
David Elson
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -24.1
3th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Dutch WitteDavid Elson
EliteStrongAverageLean
1933Actual season year • SRS range -26.8 to -13.22009
Active comparison point
Dutch Witte • 1935
1935 Wyoming
Best season4-4 • SRS -13.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+6.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
David Elson
Nearest year 2007 • Western Kentucky
7-5 • SRS -13.9 • SP Overall -22.5
Dutch Witte holds a 0.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dutch Witte | |||||
| Wyoming | 1933-1938 | 6 | 16-30-3 | -20.0 | -13.2Longest stop |
| David Elson | |||||
| Western Kentucky | 2007-2009 | 3 | 9-27 | -19.7 | -13.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Longer run
Full profile →Dutch Witte
16-30-3 • 35.7% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
6 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Wyoming 1935
SRS -13.2
Worst Season
Wyoming 1933
SRS -26.8
Biggest Improvement
Wyoming 1934
7.4 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →David Elson
9-27 • 25.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
-22.7 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Western Kentucky 2007
SRS -13.9
Worst Season
Western Kentucky 2009
SRS -22.7
Biggest Improvement
Western Kentucky 2009
-0.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.