Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jim Tatum vs Terry Donahue
Jim Tatum: 94th pct vs Terry Donahue: 91st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jim Tatum vs Terry Donahue
Jim Tatum: 94th pct vs Terry Donahue: 91st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Tatum
Jim Tatum: 93rd pct vs Terry Donahue: 89th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Terry Donahue
Terry Donahue: 43rd pct vs Jim Tatum: 40th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Tatum
Jim Tatum: 1 title vs Terry Donahue: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Terry Donahue
Terry Donahue: 20 seasons vs Jim Tatum: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Jim Tatum
Jim Tatum: 72.9% vs Terry Donahue: 66.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Terry Donahue sets the reference point in overall strength.
Terry Donahue sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Terry Donahue
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 16.9
96th pct
Elite
Jim Tatum
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-1-1 • SRS 22.6 • SP Overall 24.2
Win %
87.5%
YoY SRS
+4.8
SP Off / Def
42.6 / 20.2
Finish
#5
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Tatum
Nearest year 1958 • North Carolina
6-4 • SRS 11.0 • SP Overall —
Terry Donahue holds a 11.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Donahue | |||||
| UCLA | 1976-1995 | 20 | 151-74-8 | 14.1 | 22.6Longest stop |
| Jim Tatum | |||||
| North Carolina | 1942-1958 | 4 | 19-17-3 | 7.2 | 11.0 |
| Oklahoma | 1946-1946 | 1 | 8-3 | 13.6 | 13.6 |
| Maryland | 1947-1955 | 9 | 73-15-4 | 17.1Best quality | 25.9Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
151-74-8 • 66.5% • 20 seasons • 0 titles
20 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
UCLA 1982
SRS 22.6
Worst Season
UCLA 1994
SRS 1.6
Biggest Improvement
UCLA 1993
18.1 SRS
100-35-7 • 72.9% • 14 seasons • 1 title
25.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Maryland 1951
SRS 25.9
Worst Season
North Carolina 1956
SRS -0.7
Biggest Improvement
Maryland 1951
18.0 SRS