Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Mather vs Fritz Shurmur
Chuck Mather: 25th pct vs Fritz Shurmur: 25th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Fritz ShurmurChuck Mather
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Mather vs Fritz Shurmur
Chuck Mather: 36th pct vs Fritz Shurmur: 33rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Fritz Shurmur
Fritz Shurmur: 65th pct vs Chuck Mather: 56th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Mather vs Fritz Shurmur
Chuck Mather: 0 titles vs Fritz Shurmur: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Mather vs Fritz Shurmur
Chuck Mather: 4 seasons vs Fritz Shurmur: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Fritz Shurmur
Fritz Shurmur: 34.1% vs Chuck Mather: 31.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Fritz Shurmur sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeFritz Shurmur sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Fritz Shurmur
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -8.2
32th pct
Lower end
Chuck Mather
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Fritz ShurmurChuck Mather
EliteStrongAverageLean
1954Actual season year • SRS range -17.2 to 0.41974
Active comparison point
Fritz Shurmur • 1973
1973 Wyoming
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-7 • SRS -0.5 • SP Overall 3.1
Win %
36.4%
YoY SRS
+13.5
SP Off / Def
30.8 / 29.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chuck Mather
Nearest year 1957 • Kansas
5-4-1 • SRS -7.4 • SP Overall —
Fritz Shurmur holds a 6.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz Shurmur | |||||
| Wyoming | 1971-1974 | 4 | 15-29 | -8.2 | -0.5 |
| Chuck Mather | |||||
| Kansas | 1954-1957 | 4 | 11-26-3 | -7.8 | 0.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Fritz Shurmur
15-29 • 34.1% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
65th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Wyoming 1973
SRS -0.5
Worst Season
Wyoming 1972
SRS -14.0
Biggest Improvement
Wyoming 1973
13.5 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Chuck Mather
11-26-3 • 31.3% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kansas 1956
SRS 0.4
Worst Season
Kansas 1954
SRS -17.2
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 1955
10.4 SRS