Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: William McMurray
William McMurray: 12th pct vs Dennis Grady: 5th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
William McMurrayDennis Grady
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: William McMurray vs Dennis Grady
William McMurray: 5th pct vs Dennis Grady: 4th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dennis Grady vs William McMurray
Dennis Grady: 0 titles vs William McMurray: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dennis Grady vs William McMurray
Dennis Grady: 1 seasons vs William McMurray: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: William McMurray
William McMurray: 42.9% vs Dennis Grady: 14.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
William McMurray
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Dennis Grady
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
William McMurrayDennis Grady
EliteStrongAverageLean
1905Actual season year • SRS range -20.0 to -19.91913
Active comparison point
William McMurray • 1905
1905 Wyoming
Best seasonWorst season3-4 • SRS -19.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
42.9%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dennis Grady
Nearest year 1913 • Northwestern
1-6 • SRS -20.0 • SP Overall —
William McMurray holds a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William McMurray | |||||
| Wyoming | 1905-1905 | 1 | 3-4 | -19.9 | -19.9 |
| Dennis Grady | |||||
| Northwestern | 1913-1913 | 1 | 1-6 | -20.0 | -20.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →William McMurray
3-4 • 42.9% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
12th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Wyoming 1905
SRS -19.9
Worst Season
Wyoming 1905
SRS -19.9
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Dennis Grady
1-6 • 14.3% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Northwestern 1913
SRS -20.0
Worst Season
Northwestern 1913
SRS -20.0
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.