Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Vic KoenningMike Jinks

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Similar

Similar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning

Mike Jinks: 10th pct vs Vic Koenning: 8th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Similar

Similar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning

Mike Jinks: 11th pct vs Vic Koenning: 11th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Narrow edge

Edge: Vic Koenning

Vic Koenning: 91st pct vs Mike Jinks: 88th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning

Mike Jinks: 0 titles vs Vic Koenning: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning

Mike Jinks: 3 seasons vs Vic Koenning: 3 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Clear edge

Edge: Mike Jinks

Mike Jinks: 22.6% vs Vic Koenning: 14.7%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Mike Jinks has the clear edge in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Clear edge

Mike Jinks has the clear edge in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Vic Koenning

Lower end

Raw avg SP Overall: -18.0

10th pct

Lower end

Mike Jinks

Lower end

Raw avg SP Overall: -12.9

20th pct

Lower end

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Vic KoenningMike Jinks
EliteStrongAverageLean
2000Actual season year • SRS range -21.0 to -12.72018

Active comparison point

Vic Koenning2002

Selected

2002 Wyoming

Best seasonBiggest improvement

2-10 • SRS -13.1 • SP Overall -12.8

Win %

16.7%

YoY SRS

+4.0

SP Off / Def

31.2 / 40.3

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Mike Jinks

Nearest year 2016Bowling Green

Profile

4-8 • SRS -12.7 • SP Overall -6.6

Vic Koenning trails by a 0.4-point SRS edge at this point.

Offense gap: +6.2 SP offense

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Vic Koenning
Wyoming2000-200235-29-17.0-13.1
Mike Jinks
Bowling Green2016-201837-24-16.0-12.7

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Similar overall level

Vic Koenning

5-2914.7%3 seasons • 0 titles

This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.

Full profile →

Best Season

Wyoming 2002

SRS -13.1

Worst Season

Wyoming 2000

SRS -20.7

Biggest Improvement

Wyoming 2002

4.0 SRS

Similar overall level

Mike Jinks

7-2422.6%3 seasons • 0 titles

This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.

Full profile →

Best Season

Bowling Green 2016

SRS -12.7

Worst Season

Bowling Green 2018

SRS -21.0

Biggest Improvement

Bowling Green 2017

-1.6 SRS