Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning
Mike Jinks: 10th pct vs Vic Koenning: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning
Mike Jinks: 10th pct vs Vic Koenning: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning
Mike Jinks: 11th pct vs Vic Koenning: 11th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Vic Koenning
Vic Koenning: 91st pct vs Mike Jinks: 88th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning
Mike Jinks: 0 titles vs Vic Koenning: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mike Jinks vs Vic Koenning
Mike Jinks: 3 seasons vs Vic Koenning: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Mike Jinks
Mike Jinks: 22.6% vs Vic Koenning: 14.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Jinks has the clear edge in overall strength.
Mike Jinks has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Vic Koenning
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.0
10th pct
Lower end
Mike Jinks
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.9
20th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
2-10 • SRS -13.1 • SP Overall -12.8
Win %
16.7%
YoY SRS
+4.0
SP Off / Def
31.2 / 40.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike Jinks
Nearest year 2016 • Bowling Green
4-8 • SRS -12.7 • SP Overall -6.6
Vic Koenning trails by a 0.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +6.2 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vic Koenning | |||||
| Wyoming | 2000-2002 | 3 | 5-29 | -17.0 | -13.1 |
| Mike Jinks | |||||
| Bowling Green | 2016-2018 | 3 | 7-24 | -16.0 | -12.7 |
Closing takeaway
5-29 • 14.7% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Wyoming 2002
SRS -13.1
Worst Season
Wyoming 2000
SRS -20.7
Biggest Improvement
Wyoming 2002
4.0 SRS
7-24 • 22.6% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Bowling Green 2016
SRS -12.7
Worst Season
Bowling Green 2018
SRS -21.0
Biggest Improvement
Bowling Green 2017
-1.6 SRS