Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Lloyd Eaton
Lloyd Eaton: 80th pct vs Justin Fuente: 57th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Lloyd EatonJustin Fuente
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Lloyd Eaton
Lloyd Eaton: 90th pct vs Justin Fuente: 74th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Justin Fuente
Justin Fuente: 17th pct vs Lloyd Eaton: 8th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Justin Fuente vs Lloyd Eaton
Justin Fuente: 0 titles vs Lloyd Eaton: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Justin Fuente vs Lloyd Eaton
Justin Fuente: 10 seasons vs Lloyd Eaton: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Lloyd Eaton
Lloyd Eaton: 63.0% vs Justin Fuente: 56.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Justin Fuente has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeJustin Fuente has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Lloyd Eaton
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.3
12th pct
Lower end
Justin Fuente
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 4.9
72th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Lloyd EatonJustin Fuente
EliteStrongAverageLean
Justin Fuente: 2016 Virginia Tech
1962Actual season year • SRS range -13.9 to 23.42021
Active comparison point
Lloyd Eaton • 1966
1966 Wyoming
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-1 • SRS 23.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
90.9%
YoY SRS
+21.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Justin Fuente
Nearest year 2012 • Memphis
4-8 • SRS -13.9 • SP Overall -10.0
Lloyd Eaton holds a 37.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyd Eaton | |||||
| Wyoming | 1962-1970 | 9 | 57-33-2 | 5.5 | 23.4Highest peak |
| Justin Fuente | |||||
| Memphis | 2012-2015 | 4 | 26-23 | -1.5 | 9.3 |
| Virginia Tech | 2016-2021 | 6 | 43-31 | 6.6Best quality | 15.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Lloyd Eaton
57-33-2 • 63.0% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
80th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Wyoming 1966
SRS 23.4
Worst Season
Wyoming 1970
SRS -13.8
Biggest Improvement
Wyoming 1966
21.1 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Justin Fuente
69-54 • 56.1% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
17th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Virginia Tech 2016
SRS 15.0
Worst Season
Memphis 2012
SRS -13.9
Biggest Improvement
Memphis 2014
15.9 SRS