Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches

Choose two to four coaches

HI DeanJohn Van Liew

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Clear edge

Edge: HI Dean

HI Dean: 14th pct vs John Van Liew: 4th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Similar

Similar: HI Dean vs John Van Liew

HI Dean: 8th pct vs John Van Liew: 6th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Decisive edge

Edge: HI Dean

HI Dean: 9th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: HI Dean vs John Van Liew

HI Dean: 0 titles vs John Van Liew: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: John Van Liew vs HI Dean

John Van Liew: 4 seasons vs HI Dean: 3 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: HI Dean

HI Dean: 47.9% vs John Van Liew: 17.6%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

HI Dean

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall: —

—

Insufficient sample

John Van Liew

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall: —

—

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

HI DeanJohn Van Liew

EliteStrongAverageLean

Stronger late run

HI Dean closed stronger late in the arc.

John Van Liew: 1930 NC State

1909Actual season year • SRS range -41.4 to -15.81930

Active comparison point

HI Dean • 1911

Selected

1911 Wyoming

Best seasonBiggest drop

4-3-1 • SRS -15.8 • SP Overall —

Win %

56.3%

YoY SRS

+7.4

SP Off / Def

— / —

Finish

Unranked

Open coach profile →

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

John Van Liew

Nearest year 1927 • Western Colorado

Profile

1-6 • SRS -41.1 • SP Overall —

HI Dean holds a 25.3-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

School	Years	Seasons	Record	Avg SRS	Peak
HI Dean
Wyoming	1909-1911	3	11-12-1	-26.8	-15.8Highest peak
John Van Liew
Western Colorado	1927-1927	1	1-6	-41.1	-41.1
NC State	1930-1930	1	2-8	-17.6Best quality	-17.6

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Higher career quality

HI Dean

11-12-1 • 47.9% • 3 seasons • 0 titles

14th pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Wyoming 1911

SRS -15.8

Worst Season

Wyoming 1909

SRS -41.4

Biggest Improvement

Wyoming 1910

18.2 SRS

Broader school footprint

John Van Liew

3-14 • 17.6% • 2 seasons • 0 titles

2 schools across the tracked career.

Full profile →

Best Season

NC State 1930

SRS -17.6

Worst Season

Western Colorado 1927

SRS -41.1

Biggest Improvement

NC State 1930

23.5 SRS

Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.