Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Sutherland
Jim Sutherland: 53rd pct vs Andy Pilney: 46th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Sutherland
Jim Sutherland: 53rd pct vs Andy Pilney: 46th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Sutherland
Jim Sutherland: 66th pct vs Andy Pilney: 59th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Andy Pilney
Andy Pilney: 82nd pct vs Jim Sutherland: 67th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Andy Pilney vs Jim Sutherland
Andy Pilney: 0 titles vs Jim Sutherland: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Andy Pilney vs Jim Sutherland
Andy Pilney: 8 seasons vs Jim Sutherland: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jim Sutherland
Jim Sutherland: 48.8% vs Andy Pilney: 35.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Andy Pilney
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jim Sutherland
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
3-6-1 • SRS 9.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
35.0%
YoY SRS
+5.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Sutherland
Nearest year 1960 • Washington State
4-5-1 • SRS -0.9 • SP Overall —
Andy Pilney holds a 10.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Pilney | |||||
| Tulane | 1954-1961 | 8 | 25-49-6 | 3.8 | 9.2 |
| Jim Sutherland | |||||
| Washington State | 1956-1963 | 8 | 37-39-4 | 3.5 | 11.8Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
25-49-6 • 35.0% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
82nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Tulane 1960
SRS 9.2
Worst Season
Tulane 1961
SRS -1.8
Biggest Improvement
Tulane 1955
9.3 SRS
37-39-4 • 48.8% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
53rd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Washington State 1958
SRS 11.8
Worst Season
Washington State 1956
SRS -3.0
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 1957
11.7 SRS