Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: William Chadwick
William Chadwick: 48th pct vs Tommy OBoyle: 27th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Tommy OBoyleWilliam Chadwick
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: William Chadwick vs Tommy OBoyle
William Chadwick: 38th pct vs Tommy OBoyle: 37th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: William Chadwick vs Tommy OBoyle
William Chadwick: 91st pct vs Tommy OBoyle: 89th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Tommy OBoyle vs William Chadwick
Tommy OBoyle: 0 titles vs William Chadwick: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: William Chadwick vs Tommy OBoyle
William Chadwick: 5 seasons vs Tommy OBoyle: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: William Chadwick
William Chadwick: 69.8% vs Tommy OBoyle: 16.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tommy OBoyle
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
William Chadwick
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tommy OBoyleWilliam Chadwick
EliteStrongAverageLean
1909Actual season year • SRS range -8.8 to 1.21965
Active comparison point
Tommy OBoyle • 1964
1964 Tulane
Best season3-7 • SRS 1.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
30.0%
YoY SRS
+4.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
William Chadwick
Nearest year 1913 • Mississippi State
6-1-1 • SRS -3.9 • SP Overall —
Tommy OBoyle holds a 5.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy OBoyle | |||||
| Tulane | 1962-1965 | 4 | 6-33-1 | -3.8 | 1.1 |
| William Chadwick | |||||
| Mississippi State | 1909-1913 | 5 | 29-12-2 | -3.5 | 1.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Tommy OBoyle
6-33-1 • 16.3% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Tulane 1964
SRS 1.1
Worst Season
Tulane 1962
SRS -8.7
Biggest Improvement
Tulane 1963
5.3 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →William Chadwick
29-12-2 • 69.8% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
48th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Mississippi State 1910
SRS 1.2
Worst Season
Mississippi State 1912
SRS -8.8
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 1910
4.9 SRS