Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Wilson vs Curtis Johnson
Frank Wilson: 18th pct vs Curtis Johnson: 15th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Curtis JohnsonFrank Wilson
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Curtis Johnson vs Frank Wilson
Curtis Johnson: 21st pct vs Frank Wilson: 20th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Curtis Johnson
Curtis Johnson: 72nd pct vs Frank Wilson: 50th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Curtis Johnson vs Frank Wilson
Curtis Johnson: 0 titles vs Frank Wilson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Curtis Johnson vs Frank Wilson
Curtis Johnson: 4 seasons vs Frank Wilson: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Frank Wilson
Frank Wilson: 39.6% vs Curtis Johnson: 30.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Curtis Johnson and Frank Wilson look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarCurtis Johnson and Frank Wilson look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Curtis Johnson
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.9
15th pct
Lower end
Frank Wilson
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.9
15th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Curtis JohnsonFrank Wilson
EliteStrongAverageLean
2012Actual season year • SRS range -21.8 to -6.32019
Active comparison point
Curtis Johnson • 2013
2013 Tulane
Best seasonBiggest improvement7-6 • SRS -6.3 • SP Overall -8.0
Win %
53.8%
YoY SRS
+12.9
SP Off / Def
15.6 / 24.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Frank Wilson
Nearest year 2016 • UTSA
6-7 • SRS -7.3 • SP Overall -11.2
Curtis Johnson holds a 1.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -7.1 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Johnson | |||||
| Tulane | 2012-2015 | 4 | 15-34 | -15.0 | -6.3 |
| Frank Wilson | |||||
| UTSA | 2016-2019 | 4 | 19-29 | -14.8 | -7.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Curtis Johnson
15-34 • 30.6% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
72nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Tulane 2013
SRS -6.3
Worst Season
Tulane 2012
SRS -19.2
Biggest Improvement
Tulane 2013
12.9 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Frank Wilson
19-29 • 39.6% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UTSA 2016
SRS -7.3
Worst Season
UTSA 2018
SRS -21.8
Biggest Improvement
UTSA 2019
0.7 SRS