Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Ewing Freeland
Ewing Freeland: 13th pct vs Mark Hutson: 4th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mark HutsonEwing Freeland
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Mark Hutson vs Ewing Freeland
Mark Hutson: 5th pct vs Ewing Freeland: 5th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Ewing Freeland vs Mark Hutson
Ewing Freeland: 0 titles vs Mark Hutson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Ewing Freeland vs Mark Hutson
Ewing Freeland: 1 seasons vs Mark Hutson: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Ewing Freeland
Ewing Freeland: 44.4% vs Mark Hutson: 0.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mark Hutson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMark Hutson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mark Hutson
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.5
5th pct
Lower end
Ewing Freeland
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mark HutsonEwing Freeland
EliteStrongAverageLean
1915Actual season year • SRS range -19.3 to -19.22012
Active comparison point
Mark Hutson • 2012
2012 Tulane
Best seasonWorst season0-6 • SRS -19.2 • SP Overall -22.5
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
17.8 / 41.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Ewing Freeland
Nearest year 1915 • TCU
4-5 • SRS -19.3 • SP Overall —
Mark Hutson holds a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Hutson | |||||
| Tulane | 2012-2012 | 1 | 0-6 | -19.2 | -19.2 |
| Ewing Freeland | |||||
| TCU | 1915-1915 | 1 | 4-5 | -19.3 | -19.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Mark Hutson
0-6 • 0.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Tulane 2012
SRS -19.2
Worst Season
Tulane 2012
SRS -19.2
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Higher career quality
Full profile →Ewing Freeland
4-5 • 44.4% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
13th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
TCU 1915
SRS -19.3
Worst Season
TCU 1915
SRS -19.3
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.