Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Joe Curtis
Joe Curtis: 32nd pct vs Ray Dauber: 14th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Joe CurtisRay Dauber
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Ray Dauber vs Joe Curtis
Ray Dauber: 11th pct vs Joe Curtis: 11th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Joe Curtis vs Ray Dauber
Joe Curtis: 0 titles vs Ray Dauber: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Joe Curtis vs Ray Dauber
Joe Curtis: 2 seasons vs Ray Dauber: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Joe Curtis
Joe Curtis: 76.9% vs Ray Dauber: 31.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Joe Curtis
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Ray Dauber
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Joe CurtisRay Dauber
EliteStrongAverageLean
1907Actual season year • SRS range -15.3 to -12.81932
Active comparison point
Joe Curtis • 1908
1908 Tulane
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest drop7-1 • SRS -13.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
87.5%
YoY SRS
+2.3
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Ray Dauber
Nearest year 1931 • Mississippi State
2-6 • SRS -15.2 • SP Overall —
Joe Curtis holds a 2.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Curtis | |||||
| Tulane | 1907-1908 | 2 | 10-3 | -14.2 | -13.0 |
| Ray Dauber | |||||
| Mississippi State | 1931-1932 | 2 | 5-11 | -14.0 | -12.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Joe Curtis
10-3 • 76.9% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
32nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Tulane 1908
SRS -13.0
Worst Season
Tulane 1907
SRS -15.3
Biggest Improvement
Tulane 1908
2.3 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Ray Dauber
5-11 • 31.3% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Mississippi State 1932
SRS -12.8
Worst Season
Mississippi State 1931
SRS -15.2
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 1932
2.4 SRS