Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jim Sutherland vs JT King
Jim Sutherland: 53rd pct vs JT King: 52nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
JT KingJim Sutherland
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Sutherland
Jim Sutherland: 66th pct vs JT King: 61st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jim Sutherland vs JT King
Jim Sutherland: 67th pct vs JT King: 66th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jim Sutherland vs JT King
Jim Sutherland: 0 titles vs JT King: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: JT King vs Jim Sutherland
JT King: 9 seasons vs Jim Sutherland: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: JT King vs Jim Sutherland
JT King: 49.5% vs Jim Sutherland: 48.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
JT King
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jim Sutherland
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
JT KingJim Sutherland
EliteStrongAverageLean
1956Actual season year • SRS range -10.3 to 11.81969
Active comparison point
JT King • 1965
1965 Texas Tech
Best season8-3 • SRS 9.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+3.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Sutherland
Nearest year 1963 • Washington State
3-6-1 • SRS -1.9 • SP Overall —
JT King holds a 11.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JT King | |||||
| Texas Tech | 1961-1969 | 9 | 44-45-3 | 3.4 | 9.9 |
| Jim Sutherland | |||||
| Washington State | 1956-1963 | 8 | 37-39-4 | 3.5 | 11.8Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →JT King
44-45-3 • 49.5% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Texas Tech 1965
SRS 9.9
Worst Season
Texas Tech 1962
SRS -10.3
Biggest Improvement
Texas Tech 1963
14.2 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Jim Sutherland
37-39-4 • 48.8% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
-3.0 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Washington State 1958
SRS 11.8
Worst Season
Washington State 1956
SRS -3.0
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 1957
11.7 SRS