Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Jeff Traylor
Jeff Traylor: 56th pct vs Curley Hallman: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jeff TraylorCurley Hallman
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Curley Hallman vs Jeff Traylor
Curley Hallman: 53rd pct vs Jeff Traylor: 52nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Traylor vs Curley Hallman
Jeff Traylor: 88th pct vs Curley Hallman: 87th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Curley Hallman vs Jeff Traylor
Curley Hallman: 0 titles vs Jeff Traylor: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Curley Hallman vs Jeff Traylor
Curley Hallman: 7 seasons vs Jeff Traylor: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jeff Traylor
Jeff Traylor: 69.7% vs Curley Hallman: 46.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Curley Hallman has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeCurley Hallman has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jeff Traylor
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 2.6
66th pct
Above average
Curley Hallman
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 4.7
71th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jeff TraylorCurley Hallman
EliteStrongAverageLean
Curley Hallman: 1991 LSU
1988Actual season year • SRS range -4.1 to 6.72025
Active comparison point
Jeff Traylor • 2021
2021 UTSA
Best seasonBiggest improvement12-2 • SRS 6.4 • SP Overall 6.5
Win %
85.7%
YoY SRS
+10.3
SP Off / Def
33.0 / 27.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Curley Hallman
Nearest year 1994 • LSU
4-7 • SRS 4.4 • SP Overall 6.9
Jeff Traylor holds a 2.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +0.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Traylor | |||||
| UTSA | 2020-2025 | 6 | 46-20 | 0.6 | 6.4Longest stop |
| Curley Hallman | |||||
| Southern Miss | 1988-1989 | 2 | 15-8 | 5.7Best quality | 6.7 |
| LSU | 1991-1994 | 4 | 16-28 | 0.2 | 4.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Jeff Traylor
46-20 • 69.7% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
56th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
UTSA 2021
SRS 6.4
Worst Season
UTSA 2020
SRS -3.9
Biggest Improvement
UTSA 2021
10.3 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Curley Hallman
31-36 • 46.3% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Southern Miss 1988
SRS 6.7
Worst Season
LSU 1992
SRS -4.1
Biggest Improvement
LSU 1994
5.2 SRS