Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Mark Banks
Mark Banks: 44th pct vs Harry Hartsell: 37th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mark BanksHarry Hartsell
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Harry Hartsell
Harry Hartsell: 47th pct vs Mark Banks: 43rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Mark Banks
Mark Banks: 59th pct vs Harry Hartsell: 55th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Harry Hartsell vs Mark Banks
Harry Hartsell: 0 titles vs Mark Banks: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mark Banks vs Harry Hartsell
Mark Banks: 8 seasons vs Harry Hartsell: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Mark Banks
Mark Banks: 59.7% vs Harry Hartsell: 47.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mark Banks
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Harry Hartsell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mark BanksHarry Hartsell
EliteStrongAverageLean
Mark Banks: 1921 Tennessee
1917Actual season year • SRS range -13.8 to 4.91925
Active comparison point
Mark Banks • 1922
1922 Tennessee
Best season8-2 • SRS 3.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+4.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Harry Hartsell
Nearest year 1922 • NC State
4-6 • SRS -2.5 • SP Overall —
Mark Banks holds a 6.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Banks | |||||
| Drake | 1918-1920 | 3 | 11-10-1 | -0.8Best quality | 3.4 |
| Tennessee | 1921-1925 | 5 | 27-15-3 | -5.4 | 3.5 |
| Harry Hartsell | |||||
| NC State | 1917-1923 | 4 | 16-18-4 | -4.4 | 4.9Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Mark Banks
38-25-4 • 59.7% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
44th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Tennessee 1922
SRS 3.5
Worst Season
Tennessee 1924
SRS -13.8
Biggest Improvement
Tennessee 1925
8.6 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Harry Hartsell
16-18-4 • 47.4% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
4.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
NC State 1917
SRS 4.9
Worst Season
NC State 1923
SRS -11.8
Biggest Improvement
NC State 1922
5.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.