Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Pie Vann
Pie Vann: 52nd pct vs Tom Rogers: 43rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Pie VannTom Rogers
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Tom Rogers vs Pie Vann
Tom Rogers: 53rd pct vs Pie Vann: 52nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Tom Rogers
Tom Rogers: 70th pct vs Pie Vann: 67th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Pie Vann vs Tom Rogers
Pie Vann: 0 titles vs Tom Rogers: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Pie Vann vs Tom Rogers
Pie Vann: 6 seasons vs Tom Rogers: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Pie Vann
Pie Vann: 61.6% vs Tom Rogers: 46.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Pie Vann
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Tom Rogers
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Pie VannTom Rogers
EliteStrongAverageLean
1951Actual season year • SRS range -9.6 to 6.61968
Active comparison point
Pie Vann • 1966
1966 Southern Miss
Best seasonBiggest improvement6-4 • SRS 6.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+9.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Tom Rogers
Nearest year 1955 • Wake Forest
5-4-1 • SRS -0.1 • SP Overall —
Pie Vann holds a 6.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pie Vann | |||||
| Southern Miss | 1963-1968 | 6 | 34-21-1 | -0.3 | 6.3 |
| Tom Rogers | |||||
| Wake Forest | 1951-1955 | 5 | 21-25-4 | -0.1 | 6.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Pie Vann
34-21-1 • 61.6% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
52nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Southern Miss 1966
SRS 6.3
Worst Season
Southern Miss 1964
SRS -9.6
Biggest Improvement
Southern Miss 1966
9.2 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Tom Rogers
21-25-4 • 46.0% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Wake Forest 1951
SRS 6.6
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1953
SRS -9.5
Biggest Improvement
Wake Forest 1954
8.9 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.