Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Marv LevyJimmy DeHart

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Jimmy DeHart

Jimmy DeHart: 39th pct vs Marv Levy: 35th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Similar

Similar: Jimmy DeHart vs Marv Levy

Jimmy DeHart: 52nd pct vs Marv Levy: 50th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Clear edge

Edge: Marv Levy

Marv Levy: 61st pct vs Jimmy DeHart: 49th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Jimmy DeHart vs Marv Levy

Jimmy DeHart: 0 titles vs Marv Levy: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Jimmy DeHart vs Marv Levy

Jimmy DeHart: 11 seasons vs Marv Levy: 11 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Clear edge

Edge: Jimmy DeHart

Jimmy DeHart: 50.5% vs Marv Levy: 43.2%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Marv Levy

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Jimmy DeHart

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Marv LevyJimmy DeHart
EliteStrongAverageLean
Marv Levy: 1960 CaliforniaMarv Levy: 1964 William & MaryJimmy DeHart: 1926 DukeJimmy DeHart: 1931 Washington and Lee
1922Actual season year • SRS range -16.8 to 6.31968

Active comparison point

Marv Levy1963

Selected

1963 California

Best season

4-5-1 • SRS 5.7 • SP Overall

Win %

45.0%

YoY SRS

+6.1

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Jimmy DeHart

Nearest year 1932Washington and Lee

Profile

1-9 • SRS -15.0 • SP Overall

Marv Levy holds a 20.7-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Marv Levy
New Mexico1958-1959214-6-0.74.1
California1960-196348-29-3-1.05.7
William & Mary1964-1968523-25-2-9.4-3.6
Jimmy DeHart
Washington and Lee1922-1932627-27-4-3.86.3
Duke1926-1930524-23-2-6.6-1.3

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Steadier arc

Marv Levy

45-60-543.2%11 seasons • 0 titles

61st pct steadiness score.

Full profile →

Best Season

California 1963

SRS 5.7

Worst Season

William & Mary 1968

SRS -14.2

Biggest Improvement

New Mexico 1959

9.5 SRS

Higher career quality

Jimmy DeHart

51-50-650.5%11 seasons • 0 titles

39th pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Washington and Lee 1924

SRS 6.3

Worst Season

Duke 1926

SRS -16.8

Biggest Improvement

Duke 1927

12.7 SRS