Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson: 75th pct vs Joe Tiller: 64th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson: 75th pct vs Joe Tiller: 64th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Joe Tiller vs Paul Johnson
Joe Tiller: 81st pct vs Paul Johnson: 81st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Tiller
Joe Tiller: 48th pct vs Paul Johnson: 44th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Joe Tiller vs Paul Johnson
Joe Tiller: 0 titles vs Paul Johnson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Joe Tiller vs Paul Johnson
Joe Tiller: 18 seasons vs Paul Johnson: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Paul Johnson vs Joe Tiller
Paul Johnson: 59.0% vs Joe Tiller: 57.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Joe Tiller has the clear edge in overall strength.
Joe Tiller has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Joe Tiller
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 8.7
82th pct
Strong
Paul Johnson
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 2.5
66th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-4 • SRS 18.5 • SP Overall 21.7
Win %
69.2%
YoY SRS
+9.2
SP Off / Def
43.0 / 24.0
Finish
#24
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Johnson
Nearest year 2002 • Navy
2-10 • SRS -14.2 • SP Overall -16.8
Joe Tiller holds a 32.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +13.4 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Tiller | |||||
| Wyoming | 1991-1996 | 6 | 39-30-1 | -0.6 | 6.4 |
| Purdue | 1997-2008 | 12 | 87-62 | 8.9Best quality | 18.5 |
| Paul Johnson | |||||
| Navy | 2002-2007 | 6 | 45-29 | -1.4 | 4.5 |
| Georgia Tech | 2008-2018 | 11 | 83-60 | 7.7 | 18.5 |
Closing takeaway
126-92-1 • 57.8% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
-6.3 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Purdue 1998
SRS 18.5
Worst Season
Wyoming 1991
SRS -6.3
Biggest Improvement
Purdue 1998
9.2 SRS
128-89 • 59.0% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
75th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Georgia Tech 2014
SRS 18.5
Worst Season
Navy 2002
SRS -14.2
Biggest Improvement
Navy 2003
15.2 SRS