Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Frederick Speik
Frederick Speik: 24th pct vs Paul Wulff: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Frederick SpeikPaul Wulff
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Frederick Speik vs Paul Wulff
Frederick Speik: 30th pct vs Paul Wulff: 28th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Paul Wulff
Paul Wulff: 24th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frederick Speik vs Paul Wulff
Frederick Speik: 0 titles vs Paul Wulff: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Paul Wulff
Paul Wulff: 4 seasons vs Frederick Speik: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Frederick Speik
Frederick Speik: 42.9% vs Paul Wulff: 18.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Paul Wulff sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgePaul Wulff sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frederick Speik
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Paul Wulff
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.2
22th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Frederick SpeikPaul Wulff
EliteStrongAverageLean
1908Actual season year • SRS range -21.3 to -2.32011
Active comparison point
Frederick Speik • 1908
1908 Purdue
Best season4-3 • SRS -2.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
57.1%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Wulff
Nearest year 2008 • Washington State
2-11 • SRS -20.8 • SP Overall -17.5
Frederick Speik holds a 18.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frederick Speik | |||||
| Purdue | 1908-1909 | 2 | 6-8 | -11.8 | -2.3 |
| Paul Wulff | |||||
| Washington State | 2008-2011 | 4 | 9-40 | -12.2 | -3.1Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Frederick Speik
6-8 • 42.9% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
24th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Purdue 1908
SRS -2.3
Worst Season
Purdue 1909
SRS -21.3
Biggest Improvement
Purdue 1909
-19.0 SRS
Longer run
Full profile →Paul Wulff
9-40 • 18.4% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
4 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Washington State 2010
SRS -3.1
Worst Season
Washington State 2009
SRS -21.0
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 2010
17.9 SRS