Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Miles Casteel
Miles Casteel: 37th pct vs Gerad Parker: 17th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gerad ParkerMiles Casteel
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Miles Casteel
Miles Casteel: 30th pct vs Gerad Parker: 19th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Gerad Parker
Gerad Parker: 97th pct vs Miles Casteel: 90th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Gerad Parker vs Miles Casteel
Gerad Parker: 0 titles vs Miles Casteel: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Gerad Parker vs Miles Casteel
Gerad Parker: 10 seasons vs Miles Casteel: 10 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Miles Casteel
Miles Casteel: 60.7% vs Gerad Parker: 22.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Gerad Parker sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeGerad Parker sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gerad Parker
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -7.5
34th pct
Lower end
Miles Casteel
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gerad ParkerMiles Casteel
EliteStrongAverageLean
Gerad Parker: 2024 Troy
1939Actual season year • SRS range -12.7 to -2.42025
Active comparison point
Gerad Parker • 2025
2025 Troy
Best seasonBiggest drop0-0 • SRS -7.9 • SP Overall -4.8
Win %
—
YoY SRS
+1.7
SP Off / Def
23.6 / 29.0
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Miles Casteel
Nearest year 1948 • Arizona
6-5 • SRS -12.4 • SP Overall —
Gerad Parker holds a 4.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerad Parker | |||||
| Purdue | 2016-2016 | 1 | 0-6 | -12.7 | -12.7 |
| Troy | 2024-2025 | 2 | 4-8 | -8.8 | -7.9 |
| Miles Casteel | |||||
| Arizona | 1939-1948 | 7 | 41-26-3 | -8.1 | -2.4Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Gerad Parker
4-14 • 22.2% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
97th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Troy 2025
SRS -7.9
Worst Season
Purdue 2016
SRS -12.7
Biggest Improvement
Troy 2024
3.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Miles Casteel
41-26-3 • 60.7% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
37th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Arizona 1940
SRS -2.4
Worst Season
Arizona 1946
SRS -12.6
Biggest Improvement
Arizona 1940
5.7 SRS