Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Castleman vs Alpha Jamison
Frank Castleman: 30th pct vs Alpha Jamison: 29th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Alpha JamisonFrank Castleman
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Alpha Jamison vs Frank Castleman
Alpha Jamison: 27th pct vs Frank Castleman: 25th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Alpha Jamison
Alpha Jamison: 78th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Alpha Jamison vs Frank Castleman
Alpha Jamison: 0 titles vs Frank Castleman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Alpha Jamison vs Frank Castleman
Alpha Jamison: 3 seasons vs Frank Castleman: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Castleman
Frank Castleman: 52.9% vs Alpha Jamison: 50.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Alpha Jamison
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Frank Castleman
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Alpha JamisonFrank Castleman
EliteStrongAverageLean
1898Actual season year • SRS range -14.9 to -3.41907
Active comparison point
Alpha Jamison • 1898
1898 Purdue
Best season3-3 • SRS -3.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Frank Castleman
Nearest year 1906 • Colorado
2-3-4 • SRS -14.9 • SP Overall —
Alpha Jamison holds a 11.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Jamison | |||||
| Purdue | 1898-1900 | 3 | 11-11-1 | -9.7 | -3.4Highest peak |
| Frank Castleman | |||||
| Colorado | 1906-1907 | 2 | 7-6-4 | -9.8 | -4.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Alpha Jamison
11-11-1 • 50.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
78th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Purdue 1898
SRS -3.4
Worst Season
Purdue 1900
SRS -14.4
Biggest Improvement
Purdue 1900
-3.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Frank Castleman
7-6-4 • 52.9% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Colorado 1907
SRS -4.7
Worst Season
Colorado 1906
SRS -14.9
Biggest Improvement
Colorado 1907
10.2 SRS