Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Larry Siemering
Larry Siemering: 62nd pct vs MH Horr: 54th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
MH HorrLarry Siemering
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: MH Horr
MH Horr: 83rd pct vs Larry Siemering: 71st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: MH Horr
MH Horr: 8th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Larry Siemering vs MH Horr
Larry Siemering: 0 titles vs MH Horr: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: MH Horr vs Larry Siemering
MH Horr: 3 seasons vs Larry Siemering: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Larry Siemering
Larry Siemering: 66.7% vs MH Horr: 42.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
MH Horr
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Larry Siemering
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
MH HorrLarry Siemering
EliteStrongAverageLean
Larry Siemering: 1951 Arizona State
1910Actual season year • SRS range -8.0 to 19.31951
Active comparison point
MH Horr • 1912
1912 Purdue
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-2-1 • SRS 19.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
64.3%
YoY SRS
+19.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Larry Siemering
Nearest year 1950 • Pacific
7-3-1 • SRS 14.0 • SP Overall —
MH Horr holds a 5.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH Horr | |||||
| Purdue | 1910-1912 | 3 | 8-11-1 | 4.2 | 19.3Highest peak |
| Larry Siemering | |||||
| Pacific | 1950-1950 | 1 | 7-3-1 | 14.0Best quality | 14.0 |
| Arizona State | 1951-1951 | 1 | 6-3-1 | -8.0 | -8.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →MH Horr
8-11-1 • 42.5% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
19.3 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Purdue 1912
SRS 19.3
Worst Season
Purdue 1910
SRS -6.4
Biggest Improvement
Purdue 1912
19.6 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Larry Siemering
13-6-2 • 66.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
62nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Pacific 1950
SRS 14.0
Worst Season
Arizona State 1951
SRS -8.0
Biggest Improvement
Arizona State 1951
-22.0 SRS