Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: SM Hammond
SM Hammond: 21st pct vs Claude Rothgeb: 14th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
SM HammondClaude Rothgeb
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Claude Rothgeb vs SM Hammond
Claude Rothgeb: 13th pct vs SM Hammond: 13th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Claude Rothgeb vs SM Hammond
Claude Rothgeb: 0 titles vs SM Hammond: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: SM Hammond vs Claude Rothgeb
SM Hammond: 2 seasons vs Claude Rothgeb: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: SM Hammond
SM Hammond: 44.1% vs Claude Rothgeb: 22.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
SM Hammond
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Claude Rothgeb
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
SM HammondClaude Rothgeb
EliteStrongAverageLean
SM Hammond: 1897 Lehigh
1896Actual season year • SRS range -12.7 to -10.71928
Active comparison point
SM Hammond • 1897
1897 Lehigh
Best seasonWorst season3-7 • SRS -11.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
30.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Claude Rothgeb
Nearest year 1928 • Rice
2-7 • SRS -11.7 • SP Overall —
SM Hammond holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM Hammond | |||||
| Purdue | 1896-1896 | 1 | 4-2-1 | — | — |
| Lehigh | 1897-1897 | 1 | 3-7 | -11.7 | -11.7 |
| Claude Rothgeb | |||||
| Rice | 1928-1928 | 1 | 2-7 | -11.7 | -11.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →SM Hammond
7-9-1 • 44.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
21st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Lehigh 1897
SRS -11.7
Worst Season
Lehigh 1897
SRS -11.7
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Claude Rothgeb
2-7 • 22.2% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Rice 1928
SRS -11.7
Worst Season
Rice 1928
SRS -11.7
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—