Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Hugh Freeze
Hugh Freeze: 80th pct vs William Ingram: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Hugh Freeze
Hugh Freeze: 80th pct vs William Ingram: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Hugh Freeze vs William Ingram
Hugh Freeze: 87th pct vs William Ingram: 85th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Hugh Freeze vs William Ingram
Hugh Freeze: 35th pct vs William Ingram: 33rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Hugh Freeze vs William Ingram
Hugh Freeze: 0 titles vs William Ingram: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Hugh Freeze
Hugh Freeze: 15 seasons vs William Ingram: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: William Ingram vs Hugh Freeze
William Ingram: 63.1% vs Hugh Freeze: 62.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Hugh Freeze sets the reference point in overall strength.
Hugh Freeze sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
William Ingram
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Hugh Freeze
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 9.4
84th pct
Strong
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-2 • SRS 20.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+17.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Hugh Freeze
Nearest year 2011 • Arkansas State
10-3 • SRS -0.2 • SP Overall -3.3
William Ingram holds a 20.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Ingram | |||||
| William & Mary | 1922-1922 | 1 | 6-3 | -1.7 | -1.7 |
| Indiana | 1923-1925 | 3 | 10-12-1 | -1.5 | 4.3 |
| Navy | 1926-1930 | 5 | 32-13-4 | 9.9 | 18.1 |
| California | 1931-1934 | 4 | 27-14-4 | 13.9 | 20.1 |
| Hugh Freeze | |||||
| Arkansas State | 2011-2011 | 1 | 10-3 | -0.2 | -0.2 |
| Ole Miss | 2012-2016 | 5 | 39-25 | 13.9 | 21.3Highest peak |
| Liberty | 2019-2022 | 4 | 34-15 | -1.3 | 3.4 |
| Auburn | 2023-2025 | 3 | 11-14 | 6.6 | 8.3 |
Closing takeaway
75-42-9 • 63.1% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
California 1931
SRS 20.1
Worst Season
Indiana 1923
SRS -7.0
Biggest Improvement
California 1931
17.1 SRS
94-57 • 62.3% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
80th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Ole Miss 2014
SRS 21.3
Worst Season
Liberty 2019
SRS -6.7
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 2012
11.3 SRS