Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Tom HolmoeLeon Burtnett

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Leon Burtnett

Leon Burtnett: 36th pct vs Tom Holmoe: 33rd pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Similar

Similar: Leon Burtnett vs Tom Holmoe

Leon Burtnett: 45th pct vs Tom Holmoe: 44th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Tom Holmoe vs Leon Burtnett

Tom Holmoe: 63rd pct vs Leon Burtnett: 63rd pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Leon Burtnett vs Tom Holmoe

Leon Burtnett: 0 titles vs Tom Holmoe: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Leon Burtnett vs Tom Holmoe

Leon Burtnett: 5 seasons vs Tom Holmoe: 5 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: Leon Burtnett

Leon Burtnett: 38.4% vs Tom Holmoe: 29.1%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Tom Holmoe and Leon Burtnett look similar in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Similar

Tom Holmoe and Leon Burtnett look similar in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Tom Holmoe

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -1.4

52th pct

Mixed

Leon Burtnett

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -2.2

49th pct

Mixed

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Tom HolmoeLeon Burtnett
EliteStrongAverageLean
1982Actual season year • SRS range -12.7 to 4.42001

Active comparison point

Tom Holmoe2000

Selected

2000 California

Best seasonBiggest improvement

3-8 • SRS 3.9 • SP Overall 5.0

Win %

27.3%

YoY SRS

+6.8

SP Off / Def

32.0 / 28.4

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Leon Burtnett

Nearest year 1986Purdue

Profile

3-8 • SRS -11.5 • SP Overall -11.1

Tom Holmoe holds a 15.4-point SRS edge at this point.

Offense gap: +9.4 SP offense

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Tom Holmoe
California1997-2001516-39-2.13.9
Leon Burtnett
Purdue1982-1986521-34-1-2.14.4

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Similar overall level

Tom Holmoe

16-3929.1%5 seasons • 0 titles

This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.

Full profile →

Best Season

California 2000

SRS 3.9

Worst Season

California 2001

SRS -12.7

Biggest Improvement

California 2000

6.8 SRS

Higher career quality

Leon Burtnett

21-34-138.4%5 seasons • 0 titles

36th pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Purdue 1985

SRS 4.4

Worst Season

Purdue 1986

SRS -11.5

Biggest Improvement

Purdue 1984

8.4 SRS