Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Dan Lanning vs Marcus Freeman
Dan Lanning: 95th pct vs Marcus Freeman: 95th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Dan LanningMarcus Freeman
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Marcus Freeman vs Dan Lanning
Marcus Freeman: 91st pct vs Dan Lanning: 89th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Dan Lanning
Dan Lanning: 90th pct vs Marcus Freeman: 76th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dan Lanning vs Marcus Freeman
Dan Lanning: 0 titles vs Marcus Freeman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Marcus Freeman vs Dan Lanning
Marcus Freeman: 5 seasons vs Dan Lanning: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Dan Lanning
Dan Lanning: 85.4% vs Marcus Freeman: 76.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dan Lanning and Marcus Freeman look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarDan Lanning and Marcus Freeman look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dan Lanning
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 24.3
99th pct
Elite
Marcus Freeman
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 19.2
97th pct
Elite
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Dan LanningMarcus Freeman
EliteStrongAverageLean
2021Actual season year • SRS range 10.0 to 24.12025
Active comparison point
Dan Lanning • 2023
2023 Oregon
Best seasonBiggest improvement12-2 • SRS 22.3 • SP Overall 26.2
Win %
85.7%
YoY SRS
+8.1
SP Off / Def
45.0 / 18.2
Finish
#6
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Marcus Freeman
Nearest year 2023 • Notre Dame
10-3 • SRS 18.3 • SP Overall 20.1
Dan Lanning holds a 4.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +8.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Lanning | |||||
| Oregon | 2022-2025 | 4 | 35-6 | 18.9 | 22.3 |
| Marcus Freeman | |||||
| Notre Dame | 2021-2025 | 5 | 33-10 | 18.2 | 24.1Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Dan Lanning
35-6 • 85.4% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
90th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Oregon 2023
SRS 22.3
Worst Season
Oregon 2022
SRS 14.2
Biggest Improvement
Oregon 2023
8.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Marcus Freeman
33-10 • 76.7% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Notre Dame 2025
SRS 24.1
Worst Season
Notre Dame 2022
SRS 10.0
Biggest Improvement
Notre Dame 2023
8.3 SRS