Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Pat Culpepper
Pat Culpepper: 11th pct vs Brad Lambert: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Pat Culpepper
Pat Culpepper: 11th pct vs Brad Lambert: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Pat Culpepper
Pat Culpepper: 16th pct vs Brad Lambert: 12th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Brad Lambert
Brad Lambert: 60th pct vs Pat Culpepper: 21st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Brad Lambert vs Pat Culpepper
Brad Lambert: 0 titles vs Pat Culpepper: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Brad Lambert vs Pat Culpepper
Brad Lambert: 4 seasons vs Pat Culpepper: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Pat Culpepper
Pat Culpepper: 33.0% vs Brad Lambert: 25.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Pat Culpepper has the edge in overall strength.
Pat Culpepper has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Pat Culpepper
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.0
13th pct
Lower end
Brad Lambert
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -21.8
6th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
5-5-1 • SRS -9.9 • SP Overall -6.2
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+6.8
SP Off / Def
17.8 / 23.7
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Brad Lambert
Nearest year 2015 • Charlotte
2-10 • SRS -27.9 • SP Overall -21.7
Pat Culpepper holds a 18.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +5.9 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Culpepper | |||||
| Northern Illinois | 1976-1979 | 4 | 14-29-1 | -19.9Best quality | -9.9Highest peak |
| Brad Lambert | |||||
| Charlotte | 2015-2018 | 4 | 12-36 | -21.3 | -12.2 |
Closing takeaway
14-29-1 • 33.0% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
-9.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Northern Illinois 1979
SRS -9.9
Worst Season
Northern Illinois 1976
SRS -34.4
Biggest Improvement
Northern Illinois 1977
15.7 SRS
12-36 • 25.0% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
60th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Charlotte 2018
SRS -12.2
Worst Season
Charlotte 2015
SRS -27.9
Biggest Improvement
Charlotte 2018
13.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.