Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chris Scelfo vs Chris Tormey
Chris Scelfo: 24th pct vs Chris Tormey: 24th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Chris TormeyChris Scelfo
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Chris Scelfo
Chris Scelfo: 34th pct vs Chris Tormey: 22nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Chris Scelfo
Chris Scelfo: 74th pct vs Chris Tormey: 70th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chris Scelfo vs Chris Tormey
Chris Scelfo: 0 titles vs Chris Tormey: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chris Scelfo vs Chris Tormey
Chris Scelfo: 8 seasons vs Chris Tormey: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Chris Tormey
Chris Tormey: 46.7% vs Chris Scelfo: 38.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Chris Tormey and Chris Scelfo look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarChris Tormey and Chris Scelfo look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Chris Tormey
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -10.9
25th pct
Lower end
Chris Scelfo
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -11.3
24th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Chris TormeyChris Scelfo
EliteStrongAverageLean
Chris Tormey: 2000 Nevada
1996Actual season year • SRS range -23.1 to -0.22006
Active comparison point
Chris Tormey • 1996
1996 Idaho
Best season6-5 • SRS -5.8 • SP Overall -2.4
Win %
54.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
35.4 / 36.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chris Scelfo
Nearest year 1999 • Tulane
3-8 • SRS -9.5 • SP Overall -10.8
Chris Tormey holds a 3.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +2.2 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Tormey | |||||
| Idaho | 1996-1999 | 4 | 27-18 | -9.8Best quality | -5.8 |
| Nevada | 2000-2003 | 4 | 16-31 | -14.0 | -8.8 |
| Chris Scelfo | |||||
| Tulane | 1999-2006 | 8 | 36-57 | -10.9 | -0.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Chris Tormey
43-49 • 46.7% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Idaho 1996
SRS -5.8
Worst Season
Nevada 2000
SRS -23.1
Biggest Improvement
Idaho 1998
8.3 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Chris Scelfo
36-57 • 38.7% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
-0.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Tulane 2002
SRS -0.2
Worst Season
Tulane 2005
SRS -18.5
Biggest Improvement
Tulane 2002
12.7 SRS