Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Jeff TisdelGreg McMackin

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Greg McMackin

Greg McMackin: 42nd pct vs Jeff Tisdel: 37th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Clear edge

Edge: Greg McMackin

Greg McMackin: 55th pct vs Jeff Tisdel: 42nd pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Jeff Tisdel vs Greg McMackin

Jeff Tisdel: 41st pct vs Greg McMackin: 38th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Greg McMackin vs Jeff Tisdel

Greg McMackin: 0 titles vs Jeff Tisdel: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Greg McMackin vs Jeff Tisdel

Greg McMackin: 4 seasons vs Jeff Tisdel: 4 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Narrow edge

Edge: Greg McMackin

Greg McMackin: 54.7% vs Jeff Tisdel: 51.1%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Greg McMackin has the edge in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Narrow edge

Greg McMackin has the edge in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Jeff Tisdel

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -4.7

43th pct

Mixed

Greg McMackin

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -1.4

52th pct

Mixed

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Jeff TisdelGreg McMackin
EliteStrongAverageLean
1996Actual season year • SRS range -16.7 to 7.42011

Active comparison point

Jeff Tisdel1996

Selected

1996 Nevada

Best season

9-3 • SRS 3.1 • SP Overall 3.7

Win %

75.0%

YoY SRS

SP Off / Def

42.5 / 39.7

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Greg McMackin

Nearest year 2008Hawai'i

Profile

7-7 • SRS -7.9 • SP Overall -7.6

Jeff Tisdel holds a 11.0-point SRS edge at this point.

Offense gap: +18.7 SP offense

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Jeff Tisdel
Nevada1996-1999423-22-5.93.1
Greg McMackin
Hawai'i2008-2011429-25-5.27.4Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Similar overall level

Jeff Tisdel

23-2251.1%4 seasons • 0 titles

This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.

Full profile →

Best Season

Nevada 1996

SRS 3.1

Worst Season

Nevada 1999

SRS -16.7

Biggest Improvement

Nevada 1998

-4.9 SRS

Higher ceiling

Greg McMackin

29-2554.7%4 seasons • 0 titles

7.4 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

Hawai'i 2010

SRS 7.4

Worst Season

Hawai'i 2009

SRS -11.8

Biggest Improvement

Hawai'i 2010

19.2 SRS