Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Peter Rossomando
Peter Rossomando: 16th pct vs Mike Collins: 10th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Peter RossomandoMike Collins
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Mike Collins vs Peter Rossomando
Mike Collins: 7th pct vs Peter Rossomando: 6th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mike Collins vs Peter Rossomando
Mike Collins: 0 titles vs Peter Rossomando: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mike Collins vs Peter Rossomando
Mike Collins: 1 seasons vs Peter Rossomando: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Peter Rossomando
Peter Rossomando: 50.0% vs Mike Collins: 33.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Peter Rossomando and Mike Collins look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarPeter Rossomando and Mike Collins look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Peter Rossomando
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.4
12th pct
Lower end
Mike Collins
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -19.0
8th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Peter RossomandoMike Collins
EliteStrongAverageLean
2002Actual season year • SRS range -18.8 to -17.52022
Active comparison point
Peter Rossomando • 2022
2022 Charlotte
Best seasonWorst season2-2 • SRS -18.8 • SP Overall -16.4
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
24.0 / 39.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike Collins
Nearest year 2002 • UL Monroe
3-6 • SRS -17.5 • SP Overall -19.0
Peter Rossomando trails by a 1.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -3.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Rossomando | |||||
| Charlotte | 2022-2022 | 1 | 2-2 | -18.8 | -18.8 |
| Mike Collins | |||||
| UL Monroe | 2002-2002 | 1 | 3-6 | -17.5Best quality | -17.5Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Peter Rossomando
2-2 • 50.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
16th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Charlotte 2022
SRS -18.8
Worst Season
Charlotte 2022
SRS -18.8
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Mike Collins
3-6 • 33.3% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UL Monroe 2002
SRS -17.5
Worst Season
UL Monroe 2002
SRS -17.5
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—