Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Will Healy
Will Healy: 16th pct vs Fitz Hill: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Will HealyFitz Hill
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Will Healy vs Fitz Hill
Will Healy: 15th pct vs Fitz Hill: 14th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Fitz Hill vs Will Healy
Fitz Hill: 92nd pct vs Will Healy: 91st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Fitz Hill vs Will Healy
Fitz Hill: 0 titles vs Will Healy: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Fitz Hill vs Will Healy
Fitz Hill: 4 seasons vs Will Healy: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Will Healy
Will Healy: 38.5% vs Fitz Hill: 29.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Will Healy has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeWill Healy has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Will Healy
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -10.8
26th pct
Lower end
Fitz Hill
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -17.3
10th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Will HealyFitz Hill
EliteStrongAverageLean
2001Actual season year • SRS range -18.9 to -10.32022
Active comparison point
Will Healy • 2019
2019 Charlotte
Best season7-6 • SRS -10.3 • SP Overall -6.3
Win %
53.8%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
29.9 / 35.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fitz Hill
Nearest year 2004 • San José State
2-9 • SRS -18.9 • SP Overall -22.8
Will Healy holds a 8.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -3.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Healy | |||||
| Charlotte | 2019-2022 | 4 | 15-24 | -15.1 | -10.3 |
| Fitz Hill | |||||
| San José State | 2001-2004 | 4 | 14-33 | -15.4 | -10.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Will Healy
15-24 • 38.5% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
16th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Charlotte 2019
SRS -10.3
Worst Season
Charlotte 2022
SRS -18.8
Biggest Improvement
Charlotte 2021
-1.6 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Fitz Hill
14-33 • 29.8% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
San José State 2002
SRS -10.9
Worst Season
San José State 2004
SRS -18.9
Biggest Improvement
San José State 2002
4.1 SRS